Một trong những cách tăng band điểm Writing mà nhiều sĩ tử chọn nhất khi làm bài là nâng cấp vốn từ vựng. Vì lẽ đó, hôm nay YES IELTS đã tổng hợp một danh sách từ SANG, XỊN, MỊN trích từ SAMPLE 7.5+ từ các giáo viên của chúng mình.
The rising levels of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world’s cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse this decline in quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Introduction: refer to the task question, using paraphrasing. My own opinion – people should use more public transport.
Body Paragraph #1: Benefits: avoid traffic jams during rush hour + solve the problem of bottlenecks by taking public transport.
Body Paragraph #2: Reduce CO2 emission -> prevent negative effects on humans’ health.
Conclusion: authorities should encourage people to use public transport instead of private vehicles to solve traffic jams and air degradation in some main metropolitans on a global scale
Stepping into the 21st century, more contemporary attention has been placed on the suggestion of using public transport in order to reduce the level of congestion and air contamination. Personally, I raise my support towards this statement because of some reasons which will be discussed below.
To begin with, using public transport can be regarded as an effective measure to cope with traffic congestion at peak time. This allows people to commute by public vehicles instead of their personal ones thus reducing carbon dioxide emission. It is a fact that the transport infrastructure in some countries cannot meet the demand of commuters as the roads are too narrow and the number of daily used private cars is extremely high. As a result, using public transportation such as buses or subways is effective because it can carry a large number of people at the same time. Take Hongkong and Thailand as shining examples, citizens in those countries mainly travel by subway, which can partly help them avoid bottlenecks formed during rush hours.
Additionally, it is undeniable that encouraging urban inhabitants to use public transport can alleviate environmental issues. To be more specific, besides manufacturing factories, emissions from cars released into our atmosphere can cause global warming, according to scientific research. Therefore, the higher the percentage of people commuting by public transport, the smaller these detrimental effects would cause to our society. As a result, the number of carbon dioxide discharged into the air could be reduced remarkably and in the long run, it would help to cut down emissions in big cities.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that official agencies should encourage people to use public transport instead of private vehicles to solve traffic jams and air degradation in some main metropolitans on a global scale.
- Raise my support towards something ≠ Raise my objection towards something: Ủng hộ điều gì đó ≠ Phản đối điều gì đó
- Can be regarded as: Có thể được xem như là
- Effective measure: Phương pháp hiệu quả
- To cope with: Đối mặt vấn đề gì đó
- Traffic congestion = Traffic jam: Tắc đường, kẹt xe
- Peak time = Rush hour: Giờ cao điểm
- Thus + V-ing = Consequently = Therefore: Từ nối chỉ quan hệ nguyên nhân – kết quả: Do đó, theo đó, vì vậy…
- Alleviate (v): Làm giảm nhẹ vấn đề (tiêu cực) gì đó
- Detrimental effects: Những ảnh hưởng xấu
- Metropolitan (n): Vùng đô thị
- On the global scale = Globally: Phạm vi trên toàn cầu